🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.